Soap Box

There was a time when I scoffed at the notion that there was a shadowy confederacy of international political leaders, bankers, business people, media moguls and ultra rich individuals who held influence over the political and fiscal policies of a goodly portion of the planet's governments.

It seemed like the plot for a novel, the secret membership, the covert meetings, the jet setting elitists, the king makers and breakers who, by the might of the dollar, the pen and powerful friends in high places, could affect peace, war, famine and even genocide.

I speak only for myself, my own conclusions which I have come to over a period of time by observing what is and has been happening in the world, but I am no longer nearly as apprehensive about such a group, and can quite reasonably imagine it existing.

I don't know if they refer to themselves by a common name, although there have been many suggested over the years, the illuminati, the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, even the United Nations among the many, but I have come to believe that the possibility of such a group, organization cartel or cadre could well be a reality, whether a tight knit corporate type outfit with president, secretary and treasurer or just a contingent of the powerful who communicate in secret.

But, as the old saying goes, follow the money, or more succinctly, follow the power and see who profits from what.

I know you've all heard about Agenda 21, or the United Nations paper on "sustainable development� which proposes reducing the population of the earth.

What better way to aid this process than to sell the whole planet on the farce that a fetus is not a human being until it comes out of the womb and that it's destruction is not murder, but a matter of choice and a woman's control over her own body.

While it is literally impossible to do anything from cashing a check to boarding an airplane or gain entrance to almost any secured building without a picture ID, how can it be feasible for a person to vote without one?

You just convince the public that requiring a picture ID is discriminating against the poor and have the juice to have a few judges in your pocket, and bingo, your candidate picks up several thousand votes.

Who benefits from the wholesale influx of illegals across our southern borders and who would benefit from creating a fast lane to citizenship for them? Whoever benefits from cheap labor and new voters who believe their path has been cleared by certain individuals or candidates.

When the bottom line ambition is to control a whole planet, you first have to break down sovereignty and fierce national loyalties, to belittle the symbols, morals and ethics of the nations standing in your way.
What better way to accomplish this than to water down the native population with people who have no loyalty, fealty or love for the nation, resist assimilation and insist on having their own values and laws and customs adopted by their host nation rather than the other way around.

You inundate an unsuspecting nation like the European countries with refugees, Muslims who have no desire to become a part of the status quo, who do not practice abortion, and while the native population aborts itself out of majority status, the Muslim population grows exponentially, eventually becoming the dominant political power, at which time that nation will become subject to the laws and customs of Islam.

And Ms. Merkel says "bring �em on", willing to accept even more refugees, wittingly or unwittingly creating Germany's very own intifada in a few years or less.

Wonder who is pulling her strings?

This situation was created by president Obama pulling all the US troops out of Iraq and refusing to do anything about Libya and Syria, causing the millions of refugees trying to escape harm to head for the open arms of some European countries.

One domino is pushed and the rest just fall.

Was there string pulling involved?

Anybody who pays attention to the coming election realizes that there is much more at stake than at any time in recent memory, because the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Justice Scalia is ready to be filled immediately by the new president and the odds are there will be another one forth coming very soon.

We all know that one of the biggest issues is the second amendment being tampered with.

Who would benefit from a disarmed America?

Every nation that has ever succumbed to a totalitarian government has first been disarmed, just another fallen domino.

You can't lose a poker game when you've pulled all four aces out of the deck and are holding them behind your back.

What do you think?

Pray for our troops, our police and the peace of Jerusalem.

God Bless America

� Charlie Daniels

PLEASE READ BEFORE YOU POST

Feel free to comment on Charlie's soapboxes, but please refrain from profanity and "Anonymous" posts are not allowed, we need a name (it doesn't have to be your first and last name) and you MUST provide a valid email address. If you provide an email address, but leave the name as "Anonymous" we will pick a name for you based on your email address. No one other than website adminstrators will see your email address, not other posters. If you post without a valid email address, your comment (whether postive or negative) will be deleted. � TeamCDB